Frequently Asked Questions
About Early Christian Gospels

 

What is a gospel?

Before the birth of Christ, the Greek word (euaggelion) translated "gospel" meant "good news" and was commonly used to describe any kind of "news" or "report." The term acquired a technical meaning very early in the development of Christianity. Already by the time Paul wrote his letters in the middle of the first century, the word "gospel" had become synonymous with the Christian message and proclamation (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15:1-5). By the middle of the second century, it was associated with written accounts of the life of Jesus (Justin Martyr, 1 Apology 66.3; Dialogue With Trypho 10.2; 100.1) And the definition of this word has changed very little since. On this web site, a gospel is regarded as a written text that has a primary focus of narrating the events of the life of Jesus.

 

What evidence is there that early Christians wrote more than four gospels?

Comments such as the conclusion of the Gospel of John (21:25) make it clear that early Christians had no shortage of stories about Jesus. They undoubtedly spoke often of their recently departed master, sharing all that they remembered of him with each other and anyone else who was willing to listen. When it became evident that Jesus' memory could not be preserved forever by oral traditions dependent on the recollections of first-hand witnesses, some of his followers decided to write down what they believed about him for posterity. According to the Gospel of Luke, "many" ancient writers endeavored "to draw up an account " of the activities of Jesus (1:1-4). Although many of these accounts did not ultimately become New Testament gospels, they are identified and described in the writings of numerous early Christian authors, such as Origen (Homily on Luke 1:1).

 

Why does this web site only include gospels written before the end of the second century?

Since the late second century when Irenaeus of Lyons argued that there could be only four inspired gospels (Against Heresies 3.11.8), all other accounts of the life of Jesus have been regarded as suspect by the greater Christian community. Prior to this time, however, various Christians used an assortment of different texts and traditions to get information about Jesus. Followers of Jesus in Rhossus, for instance, incorporated the Gospel of Peter into their worship (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 6.12.1-6). Well into the second century, some Christians rejected written accounts altogether, regarding them as undesirable modifications of the original oral tradition that they believed began with Jesus' disciples (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.39.3-4).

Gospels written during the first two centuries are presented on this web site because they contain ancient narratives about Jesus that were important to many of his first followers. These texts often claim to be based on recollections of those who knew Jesus. Gospels written later are not included because their stories are usually derived from Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, or incorporate fanciful legends that have little to do with the earthly activities and teachings of Jesus.

 

What is the nature of the gospels found on this web site?

Many classification systems have been employed in the modern study of early Christian gospels. Traditionally, the ancient texts have been grouped into two broad categories: canonical (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) and apocryphal (all other gospels). However, this division is unsatisfactory because it does not accurately reflect the historical situation of the Christian communities prior to the formation of the canon. Further, it reflects an obvious bias against the gospels considered "apocryphal," or "of doubtful origin." Finally, it inappropriately lumps together a wide range of literature written over a long period of time in diverse locations and cultures. For instance, fourth and fifth century narratives such as the story about Christ's descent into hell have little in common with the late first century Gospel of Thomas.

Recognizing the need to move beyond the traditional canonical/apocryphal division, many modern scholars have begun to consider early Christian gospels as a useful category of texts. Within this general body of literature, they often subdivide the gospels into groups based on various internal characteristics of the texts. While these methods of classification can be useful and facilitate study, they are somewhat subjective and tend to reflect the perspectives of those who formulated them.

The goal of the classification system developed for this web site is to organize early Christian gospels written during the first two centuries into categories that can be objectively measured, thus leaving interpretation and comparison of the texts to those who study them. The gospels contained on this web site have been divided into four categories by asking two questions about each text: 1. is the gospel extant? (i.e. have manuscripts containing the text survived to the present day?); and 2. can the text be identified? (i.e. is the ancient title of the text known?)

  • Identified gospels: These texts are known from the surviving manuscripts that contain them. They are sometimes identified because they contain an explicit title; other times, they are identified on the basis of information from other sources.
  • Unidentified gospels: These texts have been recovered by modern archaeologists. As ancient manuscripts are often fragmentary, the titles have been lost and cannot be rocovered from other sources at present.
  • Lost gospels: These texts have been compiled by historians of the early church. No manuscripts containing them are known to have survived antiquity, but their titles and some quotations from them have been preserved in other early Christian writings.
  • Hypothetical gospels: It is not completely certain that these texts existed because there are no preserved ancient manuscripts and no certain references to them in early church writings. Nonetheless, careful study of the New Testament has convinced many scholars that these texts existed and were used as sources by the authors of the canonical gospels.
 
Extant
Title Known
Identified
yes
yes
Unidentified
yes
no
Lost
no
yes
Hypothetical
no
no

 

 

How do you know that the gospels included on this web site were written before the end of the second century?

Two kinds of evidence demonstrate conclusively that a gospel was written before the end of the second century:

  • Manuscript evidence: Any gospel text preserved on an ancient manuscript that can be dated to the first two centuries was obviously not originally written after that time (note: since there is some margin of error in dating manuscripts, manuscripts dated before 225 are considered from the second century).
  • Ancient citations: Many Christian texts from antiquity have been preserved with information about their authors and/or the time at which they were written. When a gospel is mentioned in or used as a source for a text known to have been written in the first two centuries, it is clear that the cited gospel was not originally written during some later time period.

On the basis of these two kinds of evidence, it is possible to identified the following texts as having definitely been written before the end of the second century.

  • Matthew: P64, P67
  • Mark: Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.11.8
  • Luke: P4
  • John: P52, P66, P90
  • Gospel of Thomas: P.Oxy. 1
  • Gospel of Peter: P.Oxy. 2949, P.Oxy. 4009
  • Secret Gospel of Mark: Described in a letter of Clement of Alexandria
  • Gospel of Mary: P.Rylands 463
  • Papyrus Egerton 2: P.Egerton 2
  • Gospel of the Ebionites: Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1.26.2; 3.21.1
  • Gospel of the Hebrews: Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, 4.22.8
  • Gospel of the Nazarenes: Clement, The Stromata 2.9.45
  • Traditions of Matthias: Clement, The Stromata 2.9.45.4

The remaining gospels found on this web site are included because they were probably written during the first two centuries.

  • The infancy gospels (Infancy Gospel of James and Infancy Gospel of Thomas) likely contain traditions from before the end of the second century, although the texts themeselves were probably elaborated in later centuries. These texts are not explicitly named during the second century, but some of the stories contained in them are mentioned by writers from this time period.
  • The hypothetical gospels (Sayings Gospel Q, Signs Gospel) , if they existed, must have been written during the first two centuries before they were incorporated in the New Testament gospels.
  • A number of small gospel fragments (P.Oxy. 840, P.Oxy. 1224, Fayyum Fragment, P.Berolinensis 11710, P.Cairensis 10735, P.Merton 51) are included although they are preserved on manuscripts copied after the second centuyr. They are included because a variety of textual considerations suggest an early origin for them and there is no significant evidence to the contrary. Despite their comparatively uncertain dates of origin, it is better to make these gospels available, rather than them exclude them; in all likelihood, they legitimately belong to this collection.